Five risk signs, and what to change after each — Ethiopia
None of them shows up in a single trade. They surface when a run of your own entries is read at one sitting, and each earns a different change the week after.
A stack shows what no rule reaches: the slip already made three times, the trade nobody wrote up, the fortnight with nothing on the page. Each means something specific, and each earns one change.
The five, side by side with their fix
| What shows up in the stack | What it means | What changes the week after |
|---|---|---|
| The same slip on a third trade | One belief, paid for three times | Copy the belief out on its own, dated; check the next trade against it |
| A write-up postponed, then skipped | Avoided, not forgotten | Write that one first next session: the plan, and what was done instead |
| Days with nothing on the page | A decision not to trade, or trades nobody wrote up | A dated line for standing down, so no blank stays ambiguous |
| A column filled every time, read back never | Habit — it has changed no decision in weeks | Move it above the trade, or end it with a dated line |
| A line tidied up once the outcome was known | The evidence of what was believed is gone | Original stays; the correction goes underneath, dated |
Third occurrence: name the belief before the next trade opens
Two trades that lost the same way are worth nothing as evidence. A third is a belief, already written in your own hand: the sentence beside all three is the same one.
The change is narrow: copy that sentence out on its own, dated, and hold the next trade against it before it opens. The hardest variant to see carries a timestamp minutes after a loss and a larger size than the one before. The mistakes guide names the repeats.
The write-up you kept postponing: two lines, first thing
Entries thin out in a predictable place: the trade opened while still annoyed, the one placed without an exit level, the size chosen by feel. A trade nobody is proud of resists being typed, and «no time tonight» turns up on cue.
So the order reverses. Next session, the one you least want to write goes down first, in two lines: what the plan said, and what was done instead. Longer will not survive a bad evening.
A blank fortnight: settle which kind it was, then date it
A gap means one of two opposite things, and until that is settled it means nothing. Either nothing was traded — a decision like any other — or trades happened and went unwritten, which clusters after a losing run.
The change costs seconds: the first kind gets a dated line, with the date the pause was meant to end. Every blank left then reads as the second kind.
A column nobody reads: move it above the trade, or end it
Any file that survives a few weeks grows columns, some filled by someone who last read them in month one. One question settles each: when did it last change what was done next?
If the answer is never, two fixes, both dated. Either it moves above the line, filled in before the trade opens where it can still affect something — or it ends, with a dated line so the blanks below do not read as neglect.
A line corrected afterwards: keep the wrong one legible
An entry saying the price would hold, followed by a price that did not, is the file working, not failing. Smoothing it later to match the outcome deletes what a stack exists to hold.
The change is mechanical: the original stays put, the correction goes underneath, dated. The pair outlives either line alone.
The twenty minutes that turn a sign into a change
Sort by the reason, not by the result
Open a month at once, grouped by the word used for the decision. Sorted by profit and loss, every stack tells one story.
Line the two clocks up first
The platform stamps its rows on server time; entries typed in the room may be on another. Settle that before reading into an hour.
Keep a screenshot beside the line
A picture of the screen at the click settles what was on it; without one, the sign is read out of memory.
Write the change before the week, the outcome after
One sentence before it starts, saying what will be different; one after, saying whether it was. Otherwise nothing is checkable.
Three things that look like signs and are not
- A losing run on its own. Losses arrive in clumps by themselves; what turns a run into a sign is the same sentence beside each row.
- One late write-up. An entry typed next morning is a busy evening; three in a month, all after losses, is the second sign.
- Entries that no longer match the current format. Shorter early lines read as neglect and are not, if the day it changed is written down.
The limit, worth knowing first: none of the five reach a trade already open. What holds then was attached beforehand — an exit level on the trading server, which works with the phone off; an amount whose loss would change nothing; low leverage. The practice calculator sits on that side of the clock.
The one floor nobody has to write down
Negative Balance Protection means clients never lose more than they've deposited. If the market moves sharply against you, your Exness account cannot go below zero.
CFDs are complex products. Trading is risky and may not be suitable for everyone.
Fifteen cases from people who found one
Three entries, same reason, but two won and one lost. Still a repeat?
The sign is the reason reused, not the results it produced. A reason that lands sometimes survives longest.
The repeat is real. Do I drop the instrument or drop the reason?
The reason. Left alone it returns next month under another instrument, harder to spot.
Four write-ups are missing and all four were losses. Reconstruct them?
The figures keep themselves, the reasoning does not, and inventing it is worse than a gap. Name the four in a dated line.
The write-up always slips to the next morning. Sign, or just my schedule?
A schedule, if it happens to every trade. The sign is selective: check whether the late ones share a skipped rule.
The blank fortnight was a holiday. Does it still need a line?
One dated line saying nothing was traded. Next year the two kinds of blank look alike.
Three columns have not been read in months. Which one goes first?
The one that takes longest to fill; ending it buys back the time that keeps the rest written.
A column is filled before the trade opens and still nobody reads it back. End it too?
Not yet — filling it in is itself a check before the trade opens.
I corrected an old line months ago and cannot recall what it said. Is that entry spent?
As evidence, yes — treat it as missing, not as agreement. Add today's date and a note that it was edited.
Two signs turned up in the same month. Which one gets the week?
The cheaper one: a dated line or an ended column, not a new habit. Two at once make next month unreadable.
Three months of entries and none of the five appeared. Am I reading them wrong?
Possibly reading them one at a time, or too soon. Take a run at one sitting, grouped by reason.
The repeat only shows on the demo, not on the real account. Does it count?
It counts, and finding it there costs nothing: the habit does not stay behind when the money is real.
Last month's change did not stick. Repeat it or pick another?
Repeat it once, smaller: it was too big for a weeknight, and a second change hides why the first failed.
Someone else read my entries and found a sign I had missed. Whose reading counts?
Both — theirs counts for more on entries written in a hurry, since you read yours with the memory attached.
The fix is obvious but there is no spare hour on a weeknight. Smallest version?
One dated sentence naming the sign, and one check above the next trade. The rest is optional.
Every entry after a loss is missing and I noticed a year late. Start again?
No. A year with a known hole is still a stack; a new file is week one. Date the hole.
Which page to open next, by sign
Write-ups missing from the very start
What the first one should have held.
Read the first trade guideOne change needs a week and somewhere to run it.
Virtual money, real prices: make one change, write it down before the week, read the run back after. The button opens the official exness.com sign-up through a partner link.
Open a free demo at Exness